Introducing SuperLoader: a better AS3 library for fetching images

This post is way overdue but in any case, I’d like to introduce (rather belatedly) SuperLoader, an image loading library for AS3. The library grew out of my work when I was building the magazine view for EspressoReader. The magazine view builds a visual grid from the images found in a collection of blogs you are browsing. Here is a screenshot of the experience:

While building the Magazine View, I was faced with a problem. Each “page” of the view read 10 blog entries and then needed to find the most relevant image to show in the interface for each entry. Posts tend to have multiple images and a lot of them are not usable. For example, the image may be a tracking 1×1 pixel image used for analytics or may be too small or large to be effective. Loading each image using a Loader was not feasable since the loader only gave dimension information once loading had been completed and I didnt really want to load a bunch of images completely only to discover they weren’t useful.

The SuperLoader library  takes care of this by actually parsing the binary data in the URLStream that it uses to load the images and can identify very early in the loading process the type and the size of the image being loaded (since that information is available in the first few bytes of the incoming data). Moreover it also includes an api for immediately canceling the load process so that you can jump to the next image in the list of images you are loading. The API looks something like this:


var loader:SuperLoader = new SuperLoader();
loader.addEventListener(SuperLoaderEvent.LOAD_COMPLETE, onLoadComplete);

private function onImageTypeIdentified(event:SuperLoaderEvent):void{

private function onImageSizeIdentified(event:SuperLoaderEvent):void{
  if(loader.imageWidth < 20 || loader.imageHeight < 20){

private function onLoadComplete(event:SuperLoaderEvent):void{
  var image:Loader = new Loader();

The library also includes a SuperLoaderQueue object to manage the load process of multiple images.

The library is released under the MIT open source license and is available on Github.


Presentation: 5 Ways iOS is better and worse than Flash

Embedded below is my presentation for tonight’s Philadelphia Flash and Flex User Groups.

Thanks everyone who could make it. It was fantastic to see the local Flash Community after way too long :).

My FlashCampPhilly presentation: Some interesting libraries to consider for your next app

Last Saturday, Philadelphia was host to its first ever FlashCamp event. The event brought together some of the biggest names in Flash and Flex in the neighborhood and beyond (special kudos to Rob Hall for organizing the event from vision to a lot of very hard work). I did have one session at the event as well, as I walked through some of the libraries I have started using in a lot of my projects, including the soon to be alpha-ed Espresso Reader. These libraries included:

Thoughts on Commercial Ecosystem for the Flash Platform

This post is in response to Grant Skinners post on a thriving commercial ecosystem for the Flash Platform. For those who are just getting caught up with the conversation, it all began with Adobe labs releasing Squiggly, a spelling library for Flash apps which may compete directly with Grant’s own Spelling Plus Library which prompted quite a few people (including Grant himself) to talk about how Adobe may be competing with developers who build on their platform. This conversation isn’t new, quite a few people said the same thing when Adobe came out with which competed with services like Picnik. As Adobe starts eying the services market with apps like Share, Buzzword, etc, developers may (justifiably) feel that it may be a matter of time before Adobe competes with them should their product seem lucrative. Considering they own the platform, ie the Flash Player, they may very well put features in that give them the advantage. For example, Adobe Connect already leverages the screen sharing capability that gets enabled on the Flash Player with the Connect plugin (yes a plugin for the browser plugin), something that non-adobe developers cannot access.

Can Adobe navigate these waters carefully enough to not alienate its developers remains to be seen, but this post is more regarding Grant’s follow up post on what Adobe can do to create a vibrant commercial ecosystem for the Flash Platform.

Actually there is a slight difference in the title of Grant’s post: “How Can Adobe Encourage a Commercial Ecosystem?” and what he writes about: “… lack the high-quality, well-supported, production-ready components that a commercial marketplace can provide.” While both are in similar vein, I feel a thriving commercial ecosystem on the Flash Platform doesnt have to be based around production ready components. There will be a few, like SPL that make a decent amount of money but those are going to be the exception and not the rule.

Adam Lehman, ColdFusion Product Manager made the point on one of the comments on that post which I most agree with: The Free Open Source marketplace which is pretty thriving on the Flash Platform does tend to kill the commercial component marketplace.

A Commercial Ecosystem on the Flash Platform is different from a commercial ecosystem on the Flash Platform based around commercial components. Grant’s own SPL is only viable till an open source version came out that may even be half as good as the SPL. The Flash developer community has become used to the Open Source way: find something out there that fills your need, if not and you find a fledgeling open source project that may have those ambitions, see if you can contribute, else build it yourself. My personal opinion is that the market for commercial components is pretty small no matter what Adobe does, and I dont think too many people miss it (except maybe a few folk coming from the Microsoft side of the world who are used to paying for components they use).

Flash Platform’s own commercial ecosystem would/should probably be around full products, embeddable widgets, AIR applications, Flash lite/mobile AIR apps etc. The best thing Adobe could do is keep powering the platform even more, add more capabilities to the runtimes, create distribution and monetization channels for the developers and make sure the developers dont feel threatened. And the developer services products on Adobe devnet seems to be a step in the right direction.

When things go wrong: Communicating error and gathering information for client side code

Having developed client side applications for the last few years in a variety of languages (Java, Flash, AIR, Javascript and recent forays into Objective C for the IPhone), its funny that some discussions appear cyclically and are discussed as though for the first time in every new project. Communicating errors in your application seems to be one of them, and I wanted to pen a few thoughts on that.

Serverside developers have it easy!
Well, no ;). But there are paradigms that have become the norm now. If something bad happens and you get a 404 or a 500 error on a webpage, its pretty likely that its been logged and if its on a major product, alarms have been raised. Client side code, especially in the languages I have worked in the last couple of years, have been less…communicative. I would like to focus on AIR and Flash here since those are the technologies I work with most often. The problem becomes more critical in AIR where you have much more things that can go wrong since you are interacting with items on the user’s machine which is not a controlled environment.

Why communicate the error?
Very few client side web apps I have worked with, including my own, have ever seemed to have handled error correctly. Most of the time, the app has been scoped with time allocated against the features and error states have never been considered. Occasionally, a developer will put in an Alert window or something similar just as a precaution (I know I have). In Flash/AIR there doesnt seem to be a good library that I can integrate into my application that encapsulates best practicess. Heck, I dont even know what the best practices are, which is what prompted me to write this post.

What would you include in the error window?
While you may want to include app specific information in the error window, I think there are a few things that make most sense:

  • An error description: What happened ? Corrupt file? Cannot connect to server? Something readable. For bonus points, can the user do anything about this, like restart the application?
  • An error code: This makes sense and if you include a support system, like a bug tracker or a 1-800 number, it would make the conversation a lot more meaningful
  • The detailed stack trace: A good paradigm I have seen here is a toggleable details state that shows/hides the detailed error stack trace, would go a long way in figuring out the source of the error
  • Extra points: email API integration, or some other way for the user to send the error description with as little pain as possible

The last point is kind of interesting, cause you might want to send more than just the stack trace of the error. You might want to set the whole application state. If you have application logging enabled, say with something like the CIM logging framework, the whole log file might be of interest. Again, the developer must ensure that he is only logging non-personal information there.

Of course there are situations when the error might cause the entire app to blow up, without giving it enough time to react to the error. Would it make sense to log and end of session event and allow users to send the application log to the server if the end of session was not successfully logged for a prior session?

Prior Art:

I started looking at some Google results for Error dialogs and crash reporters. Here are some screenshots:

First is the JXErrorPane, a Java class part of SwingX project. This seems to be the most familiar UI for reporting errors(link to API docs)


The usage is pretty simple:

try {
//do stuff.... something throws an exception in here
} catch (Exception e) {

A step up would be the UI from crash reporters which would perhaps be overkill for a web app, but would make a lot of sense for desktop apps, especially in the beta stages. Here is a screenshot from something called Bug Buddy.

Bug Buddy

Whats kind of interesting here is that it adds a field that allows user to add information about the context of the crash, as well as an email address that may be used to contact him or something.

The last screenshot is from an open source library called JRFeedbackProvider someone presented at the Philadelphia Cocoa Users Group.

JRFeedbackProvider. This has the features of the previous crash reporters but also adds a “request a feature” tab which is great if you are running an alpha version of your application and are looking for more than bug reports.

If you have seen any other error UI that seem to do a good job, please add a comment here.

New Adobe toys this week: Flash Builder 4, Flex 4 SDK, Flash Catalyst, BrowserLab

An exciting week for Flash Platform Developers as Adobe released a number of Beta versions on the Adobe Labs site. I have just started playing with a couple of them but its definitely worth the shout out.

Flash Builder 4:
Flash Builder 4 is the next version of the Eclipse based IDE formerly known as Flex Builder. The renaming is more than just a re-branding exercise, as FB4 seems to have added features that make it a lot easier to work with other frameworks besides Flex. This is really exciting for me personally as this means it will be a lot easier to work with OpenPyro in FB4. In fact Greg even created a simple project with AS3 only classes that could be exposed as MXML tags. The resultant file size is minute.

Besides that, the my favorite extension to the IDE has been the inclusion of FlexUnit, the unit testing framework for Flex. While FlexUnit itself has been available as a library for a while, inclusion into the IDE will make unit testing a lot easier and hopefully a lot more prevalent.

There is also a network monitor built right into the IDE. While I have used Firebug with success for Flash apps on the web, doing the same for AIR apps has been a challenge (though Charles has been really good, though a requires a bit of a context-switch when coding). The network monitor is going to make a lot of lives a lot easier.

Integration of ASDocs is another great feature, as well as code generation for integrating with serverside code.

[Update] There are also a bunch of improvements to the Debugger on FB4 which you can read more about here.

Flash Catalyst:
Flash Catalyst is a new tool that Adobe is releasing with the promise of truthfully translating designer interactions to stub code that a developer can add functionality to. Basically Catalyst can import any Photoshop, Fireworks or Illustration file, and then can allow the design to assign behaviors to the different parts. For example the designer can select four graphics and mark tham as the four parts of a Scrollbar. The interactions are written out as Flex4 tags that can be compiled into a swf with complete interactivity.

The video below shows how Catalyst can be used:

Flex 4:
The two releases of course directly depend on the Flex 4 SDK, Adobe’s Open Source framework for building Rich Internet Applications. The new release of the SDK introduces a new component architecture called Spark. The core difference between the Spark and the earlier Halo architecture is the favor of the composition as a design pattern over inheritance. What this translates into in everyday development is a leap in productivity as complex UI components can be created a lot easier than before and not requiring things to be subclassed as often. This also makes skinning a lot easier, since all the skin parts can be swapped pretty easily. Another new thing in Flex 4 is the introduction of a new graphics interchange format called FXG, an xml format for graphics that can be understood even by the CS4 products like Photoshop and Fireworks. Matt Chotin’s post on changes in Flex is a lot more comprehensive.

BrowserLab, a project formerly known as Meer Meer, is a new service being released by Adobe that targets HTML developers. BrowserLab allows developers to preview any URL as rendered by different browsers. The service is in limited beta, but I was able to get an account before it was capped, and I can tell you its pretty impressive. It would be interesting to see how Adobe can integrate this with Dreamweaver, although its supposed to remain open to mortals like myself who still prefer TextMate 😉

So a lot of toys on the labs site. Take em out for a spin and let me know what you think 🙂

AS3 weirdness with URLVariables for HTTP POST

Two+ hours wasted today on dealing with this. Apparently when using URLVariables to pass variables to the server using HTTP Post, using the square bracket syntax ( vars[varname] = varvalue ) sets the contentType of the URLRequest to text/html. However setting the same variables using the dot syntax (vars.varname = varvalue) sets it to text/xml. I couldn’t set the contentType to text/xml using the [] notation no matter how I tried, whether using the URLRequest.contentType property or appending a custom “Content-Type”,”text/xml” URLRequestHeader.

Hope this helps someone.